User talk:WeatherWriter

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, WeatherWriter!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:32, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shelley's Eagle Owl.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fram (talk) 16:56, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Categories

[edit]

Please do not use NOAA or NHC categories for images. For instance put Category:Hurricane Ian for all related images to that hurricane. Have a look to the changes of categories I have done on your uploads.

Pierre cb (talk) 13:03, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Radar of the Alexander City tornado emergency.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: File is a screenshot of a non-freely licensed software (RadarOmega)
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Ks0stm (TCGE) If you reply here, please ping me by using {{re|Ks0stm}} in your reply. 13:58, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:NEXRAD radar of the Selma, Alabama EF2.png

[edit]

Hi:

This is impossible to be your own work. All data being from NEXRAD, the source must be a National Weather Service website. Could you specify the correct source, the author as being «{{w|National Weather Service }}» and the copyright as {{PD_USGov-NWS}}.

Yes. All I need is the file undeleted and I can correct the errors. Elijahandskip (talk) 00:22, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:Alexander City Tornado Emergency in 2023.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Эlcobbola talk 19:07, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cyclone Freddy on February 19, 2023.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please reverse your undoing of my edit ( https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Temora_Twister_February_2007_-_panoramio_-_David_Holt.jpg&oldid=prev&diff=737746562&markasread=60541822&markasreadwiki=commonswiki). This is not a picture of a tornado but from a strong dust devil as the funnel is in blue sky in a dry environment of interior Australia. It is not because it is titled "twister", a very general term, that it is a tornado.

Pierre cb (talk) 15:13, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done! My bad on that. Elijahandskip (talk) 15:21, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK, Thanks. Pierre cb (talk) 06:08, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong page

[edit]

Hi, Your message here is on the wrong page. Please repost it on the Commons:Village pump. Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:45, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Yann. Sorry about that, I was directed there from the common’s channel in the Wikimedia Discord. Elijahandskip (talk) 13:46, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:Aerial view of homes destroyed in Rolling Fork, Mississippi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Penitentes (talk) 17:29, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Supercell hail core near Stratford, Texas on May 18, 2023.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Pierre cb.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 00:35, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Low-end EF3 damage to a home in Virginia Beach, Virginia.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Low-end EF3 damage to a home in Virginia Beach, Virginia.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Rolling Fork, Mississippi tornado disaster area on April 12, 2023 - 20230412-USDA-RD-MS-LSC- - 27.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rolling Fork, Mississippi tornado disaster area on April 12, 2023 - 20230412-USDA-RD-MS-LSC- - 27.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:2023 Grindavik eruption.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 08:10, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays

[edit]
Christmas star decoration at a window with the reflection of a sunset Happy Holidays, WeatherWriter

Merry Christmas and a happy new year!
Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!
Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
Buon Natale e felice anno nuovo!
Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr!

Aristeas (talk) 17:13, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Mayfield KY State Farm CRU -23.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mayfield KY State Farm CRU -23.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern about your first-ever uploaded file: File:2010_wikiproject_image.png

[edit]

In this image, some parts of the object and subject are affecting France, Iraq, Libya and Syria, where as linked, all of them are  Not OK for the purpose of COM:FOP. I'd not intend to nominate for deletion, but just wonder, that how likely they are all COM:DM or got properly licensed? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:28, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Still waiting for your responds regarding this issue, before, include me, anyone's DR here (not elsewhere, include not en.wikipedia). Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 13:15, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nice template but not correct. NEXRAD radar are owned and operated by the NWS exclusively. Category:TDWR radars are owned and operated by the FAA and military radars are owned by the US Defense department.

Pierre cb (talk) 11:48, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pierre cb: Wrong actually. Per NOAA, “ The Next Generation Weather Radar (NEXRAD) system is a network of 160 high-resolution S-band Doppler weather radars jointly operated by the National Weather Service (NWS), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and the U.S. Air Force.. See the NOAA website for the NEXRADs. WeatherWriter (talk) 11:55, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not owned. Only NWS/NOAA own the network. Pierre cb (talk) 11:59, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Jointly owned as stated here. “The Air Force’s 25-site replacement program is part of a three-agency U.S. government effort to standardize the 180 radars that build national weather and flight data for the National Weather Service, the Federal Aviation Administration and the U.S. military.” + “keep the 25 NEXRAD units the Air Force owns maintained and upgraded on schedule.WeatherWriter (talk) 12:04, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also check out the English Wikipedia article for NEXRAD. The full history and info about them is there. WeatherWriter (talk) 11:58, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I will comment though; even though the ownership part might have a small little typo in it. NEXRAD is still owned by the federal government; and is thus still in the public domain; whether or not it is NOAA or the FAA, they are both federal agencies. 2601:5C5:4201:68B0:D882:6FF1:3ECC:6F07 17:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Miss click?

[edit]

I dont remember doing this edition, maybe it was a miss click Wilfredor (talk) 20:26, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I sort of figured, lol. I was more just confused at first, but after not hearing back in the first few minutes, I was figuring it was a misclick. Don't worry 'bout it! WeatherWriter (talk) 20:29, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Does this count as a valid PD rationale?

[edit]

I found an ArcGIS StoryMap directly produced by the National Weather Service in collaboration between their Dallas and San Antonio forecast offices. (URL: https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/05696a8e01bc4e91a0a941290a62e86d) and it features the very same dead man walking tornado picture that is currently being nominated for deletion. Would that StoryMap since it’s directly produced by the NWS count as a valid PD rationale, even though it isn’t explicitly on a .gov website? I’ll add that it does link directly from the NWS San Antonio page on event summaries. So it was clearly made by the National Weather Service. Plus the specific StoryMap page has the NOAA/NWS logo on it, which are both registered trademarks of the aforementioned NOAA/NWS. If ArcGIS was unilaterally using those logos; they’d probably be sued by the federal government for trademark infringement. I have also left a very similar message on your Wikipedia talk page. 2601:5C5:4201:68B0:D882:6FF1:3ECC:6F07 17:32, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Damage from the 1968 Charles City tornado just south of the Cedar River looking north.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rlandmann (talk) 10:43, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just as a side note @Rlandmann, I found actual written proof that the National Weather Service indicates whether or not a particular picture on their website is under copyright protection. It’s on the NWS Norman FAQ. I have a link to it on the deletion discussion. WestVirginiaWX (talk) 04:55, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: ignore what I put above. See discussion for why. WestVirginiaWX (talk) 22:37, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1997 Jerrell tornado.

[edit]

Just to warn in advance. There is a deletion request affecting all Non-NWS images on NWS servers. And that argument is currently veering towards deletion. If the consensus is to delete. I (or someone else) will have to re-nominate the 1997 Jerrell Dead Man Walking tornado picture for deletion. I am notifying all who participated in the original discussion. WestVirginiaWX (talk) 22:36, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, an NOAA staff has relied me that NOAA was unclear about the copyright status of this photo. As a result they have removed this photo from their website. You may miss the discussion at VPC. If you have no objection, I will roll back your edits later. 0x0a (talk) 04:45, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the archived discussion at VPC. You did not provide proof of the NOAA reply. There was already a deletion request regarding the image, which determined it is public domain. The image is in the NOAA photo library, which states “Images in the NOAA Photo Library are in the public domain and cannot be copyrighted. There is no fee for downloading any images on the site. Educational use is encouraged as the primary goal of the NOAA Photo Library is to help all understand our oceans and atmosphere.” Do not revert the edits back without a full discussion (probably signed off by an administrator) a true reason to overturn the U.S. government template, which has already been checked, confirmed, and discussed. WeatherWriter (talk) 05:01, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I still have the NOAA's reply in my email, concluding that NOAA would no longer endorse the image for being in the public domain. Due to privacy concerns, I can only forward this email to VRT members, such as Krd. If you need a full discussion, I will file a deletion discussion later. 0x0a (talk) 05:22, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You can’t take back copyright licenses? Like, that image has been in the public domain for years. Legally, they can’t say it isn’t public domain anymore. This is one of the most used photographs of a tornado in the world. Tineye reverse search showed nearly 300 instant uses, including big-name media like WIRED and The Weather Channel. Sorry if I do not believe you, but I highly doubt NOAA actually said it isn’t PD anymore. I even found The Washington Post using it, crediting NOAA because it is in the public domain. WeatherWriter (talk) 05:32, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have published the content of the email here, due to privacy reasons, I do not disclose the email address, please kinly copy your opinions to the discussion. If you have any doubts about the authenticity of the email, you can also contact their public email at: "photolibrary@noaa.gov". Thank you. 0x0a (talk) 06:00, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, the image still exists in the NOAA libary. So as of August 8, 2024, it is a confirmed public domain image. WeatherWriter (talk) 05:06, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]