Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcut: COM:VIC

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

How to nominate an image for VI status

[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination.

Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)

[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this: 

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.

Renomination

[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in 

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with 

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review

[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list: 

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where Scope is the scope of both images, and candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates

[edit]

How to review an image

[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure

[edit]
  • On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
 You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
 You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  •  Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
 You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.
How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period

[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates

[edit]
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
55,907 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
 50,291 (90%) 
Undecided
  
 3,114 (5.6%) 
Declined
  
 2,502 (4.5%) 


New valued image nominations

[edit]
   

View promotion
Nominated by:
Wilfredor (talk) on 2024-07-31 03:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Death of Sardanapalus, by Eugène Delacroix, Louvre room 700
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Wilfredor (talk) on 2024-07-31 03:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Portrait of a Woman, Leonardo da Vinci, Louvre INV 778
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 06:27, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Wilfredor (talk) on 2024-07-31 18:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Scène des massacres de Scio, Louvre room 700
Reason:
best in scope -- Wilfredor (talk)
IMHO. The other painting suffers from a strong noise reduction and intensively eliminates textures from the painting Wilfredor (talk) 20:55, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's the opposite: there's been no noise reduction in postprod and the texture of the paint and brushstrokes are much more visible, on faces for example, where we can see indeed lot of noise in the candidate image. Shonagon (talk) 22:26, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not in agreement, but I respect your opinion Wilfredor (talk) 22:48, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The (right) version is the current VIC proposition

I wanted to put this comparison side by side so you can see that the one on the left, your proposal, looks cleaner and smoother with softer colors due to the noise removal and coloring algorithm of the camera, while the one on the right shows stronger colors and more textures in the upper part of the painting, as you see more details you also see more imperfections in the canvas but it is also somewhat more real. --Wilfredor (talk) 23:13, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The (right) version is the current VIC proposition

Another comparison. Yes It's a question of taste. On the right we can see the canvas and a lit bit more details but there is more noise. The colors should not be too strong, because there are not like that in the painting and plus it can be an issue for other uses. On the left we can see the Delacroix's soft tones that the restoration has reveleaded, and the subtil red of the lips.

By the way, the 2 images could be improved: the one on left needs more unsharp mask (done for this detail), and for the one on right, the ratio width/height was not corrected after perspective correction (the width is too small or the height too large, cf.: https://collections.louvre.fr/ark:/53355/cl010065870 )

Thanks for the exploration in the images and therefore in the painting. Best regards --Shonagon (talk) 01:40, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The photos were taken almost a week apart, are you sure there was such a quick restoration? I didn't know that the proposal was actually a photo taken by you, otherwise I would have been more respectful with the comments. Thanks for share your picture Wilfredor (talk) 02:03, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Both photos are of the painting after restoration and in both photos we can see the dominance of cold colors and many details. You made several photos in Louvre that replace previous pictures (I love so much this one which is fantastic and moves me a lot), including some that I took, and that are really much better. Thank you and there is absolutly no offense. For this one, I sincerly prefer the photo I took for the reasons given. Best regards --Shonagon (talk) 02:32, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 06:27, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Wilfredor (talk) on 2024-07-31 20:23 (UTC)
Scope:
The Sleep of Endymion - Girodet (Louvre INV 4935)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 06:27, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Wilfredor (talk) on 2024-07-31 22:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Don Juan by Eugène Delacroix
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 06:27, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
S5A-0043Talk on 2024-08-03 08:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Bombardier Innovia APM 300R C801B
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by:
Wilfredor (talk) on 2024-08-04 00:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Psyche revived by the kiss of Cupid by Antonio Canova, Michelangelo Gallery, Louvre
Reason:
Even if part of the object was cut? see the base --Wilfredor (talk) 18:41, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Needs a correction. Cupid not Love. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:43, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done scope fixed, however, a network of categories have this like "Love", there are many used photos and descriptions, I don't know if it is appropriate to change this. The Louvre website does not provide a translation either. --Wilfredor (talk) 21:50, 4 August 2024 (UTC) -- Wilfredor (talk)[reply]
Result: 0 support, 1 oppose =>
declined. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Wilfredor (talk) on 2024-08-04 01:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Calvary - Giovanni Bellini - Louvre RF 1970-39
Reason:
best in the scope -- Wilfredor (talk)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-04 04:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Scena di battaglia - cavaliere che colpisce con spada il portabandiera by Francesco Casanova (Pinacoteca Querini Stampalia)

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 16:09, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-04 05:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Retrat de la senyora Anita amb vestit vermell (Portrait of Senyora Anita with Red Dress) - Benet Mercadé - Museu Nacional d'Art de Catalunya

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 16:05, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-04 04:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Ritratto di donna con vaso di fiori in mano (Portrait of a woman with a vase of flowers in her hand) - Vittorio Matteo Corcos
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-08-04 09:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Eglise Saint-Géry (Aubechies), view from Espa. Pierre Descamps, (Be)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-08-04 09:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Bell Tower of the Carmel Mission San Carlos Borromeo - California, View from the Serra Memorial Prayer Garden
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
August (talk) on 2024-08-04 11:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Cultural heritage monument: Wurzner Straße 117 (Leipzig)
Used in:
d:Q49271892
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Tagooty (talk) on 2024-08-04 16:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Karanji Lake fountain, Mysore
Used in:
en:Karanji Lake • wikidata:Q128500823
Reason:
 Info Karanji in Kannada means fountain -- Tagooty (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
August (talk) on 2024-08-04 20:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Otto-Neururer-Haus (Weimar)
Used in:

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 15:32, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-08-05 04:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Detail of the monumental work of art Deltawerk // We are looking north north west.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-05 04:33 (UTC)
Scope:
La marchesa Casati come Euterpe 1931 - Alberto Martini

 Support --Thi (talk) 10:48, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-05 04:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Homme tenant un lettre by Francisco Bayeu - Goya Museum

 Support Useful and used. --Thi (talk) 10:53, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-05 04:43 (UTC)
Scope:
I Mestieri veneziani - Il negozio della modista (Pinacoteca Querini Stampalia)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2024-08-05 08:38 (UTC)
Scope:
144 rue de Lastie, Cahors
No. But can we just nominate "Monument historique" in France ? This one is listed in the "Site patrimonial remarquable" of Cahors... --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 09:31, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment we are not authorized to appoint Monument historique in France.--Pierre André (talk) 08:44, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hein ? Quoi ? Comment ? Pardonne-moi, mais je ne comprends pas. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 18:05, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-08-05 15:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Nissan Primera (P11) sedan - left rear view
Used in:
de:Nissan Primera P11
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-08-05 15:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Mercedes-Benz A236 - right rear view
Used in:
de:Mercedes-Benz Baureihe 236
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-08-05 15:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Alfa Romeo Junior - left rear view
Used in:
de:Alfa Romeo Junior
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
August (talk) on 2024-08-05 20:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Plaußiger Straße (Leipzig)
Used in:
  •  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Pierre André (talk) on 2024-08-05 21:02 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Oil mills in Matale herbal & Spice Garden, (Sri Lanka), view from koholangwela madawala ulpatha, Sri Lanka
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    August (talk) on 2024-08-06 05:26 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Rail tickets of Pommersche Landesbahnen
    Used in:
    Reason:
    The only surviving ticket document of this abandoned railway line on Commons. -- August (talk)
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-06 05:26 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Gino Rossi - Fisherman's head - Buranese fisherman - Museo d'arte moderna (Venice)
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-06 05:28 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Le Christ servi par les anges - Juan de Valdés Leal - Goya Museum
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-06 05:46 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Portait of Alberta by Juli Gonzalez - Museu Nacional d'Art de Catalunya
    Open for review.

    Review it! (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Pierre André (talk) on 2024-08-06 10:40 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Aluvihare Cave Temple, view from Kandy Rd, Sri Lanka
    Used in:
    Aluvihare Rock Temple
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    iMahesh (talk) on 2024-08-06 13:00 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Front Elevation of Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    S5A-0043Talk on 2024-08-06 13:47 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Rear view of Toyota Camry Hybrid (XV80)

     Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 18:48, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-08-06 16:51 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Research design of the new harbor mouth in IJmuiden M526. Part of the project. Hydraulic laboratory in the waterloopbos.
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-08-06 18:45 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Porsche 972 Panamera Turbo E-Hybrid - right front view
    Used in:
    ha:Porsche Panamera, no:Porsche Panamera
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-08-06 18:45 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Cupra Formentor Facelift - left front view
    Used in:
    de:Cupra Formentor
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-08-06 18:46 (UTC)
    Scope:
    DS 3 (2022) - left front view
    Used in:
    de:DS 3 Crossback

     Best in scope --August (talk) 05:24, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-07 04:36 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Ritratto di donna (Portrait of a woman) - Eleuterio Pagliano
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-07 04:40 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Notre-Dame-de-la-Platé church in Castres - The baptismal font
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-07 04:48 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Autoretrat amb boina - Francesc Gimeno - Museu Nacional d'Art de Catalunya

     Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 15:37, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    August (talk) on 2024-08-07 05:20 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Wurzner Straße 119 (Leipzig)
    Used in:
  •  Support Useful and used --Pierre André (talk) 08:30, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Grunpfnul (talk) on 2024-08-07 13:05 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Fountain installation Kreislauf des Geldes
    Used in:
    https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl-Henning_Seemann https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kreislauf_des_Geldes https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_von_Bronzebildwerken_in_Nordrhein-Westfalen https://de.wikivoyage.org/wiki/Aachen/Mitte https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1787720
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-08-07 15:34 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Porsche 972 Panamera Turbo E-Hybrid - left rear view
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-08-07 15:34 (UTC)
    Scope:
    DS 3 (2022) - left rear view
    Used in:
    de:DS 3 Crossback
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-08-07 15:35 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Nissan Primera (P11) sedan - right front view
    Used in:
    de:Nissan Primera P11
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    August (talk) on 2024-08-07 16:00 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Sellerhäuser Straße 8 (Leipzig)
    Used in:
  •  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:49, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Open for review.

    Review it! (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-08-07 16:58 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Fountain with animal sculptures. (Dog) Trier by an unknown artist.
    Open for review.

    Review it! (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Aurelio Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) on 2024-08-08 04:29 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Genshin Impact wordmark
    Open for review.

    Review it! (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Aurelio Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) on 2024-08-08 04:34 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Doki Doki Literature Club! wordmark
    Open for review.

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-08 04:52 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Signora con cappello e ombrellino - Giovanni Boldini
    Open for review.

    Review it! (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-08 04:56 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Socrate enseignant (Socrates teacher) - José Aparicio - Musée Goya
    Open for review.

    Review it! (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-08 04:58 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Ponte del Forner on Rio de la Pergola seen from Ca' Pesaro
    Open for review.



    Pending Most valued review candidates

    [edit]

    Trithemis annulata (Violet dropwing) female, lateral view

    [edit]
       

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Zzzs (talk) on 2024-06-17 21:54 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Trithemis annulata (Violet dropwing) female, lateral view
    Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
    promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 14 September 2021 (UTC)    [reply]

     Support This one has more representative colouring on the abdomen. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:46, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 06:27, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

    Review Page (edit)
    Nominated by:
    Zzzs (talk) on 2024-06-17 21:53 (UTC)
    Scope:
    Trithemis annulata (Violet dropwing) female, lateral view
    Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 06:27, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
    To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
    Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

    All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

    Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

    Pending valued image set candidates

    [edit]
       
    Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.
    Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Valued_image_candidates&oldid=907565339"